AMERICA’S TEAM AGAIN
This has been a very exciting year for Cowboy Nation. The Cowboys are 5-1 on the season, the offense is humming along like a well-oiled machine, and surprisingly, the make-shift defense hasn’t been too shabby either. “America’s Team” appears to be well on their way to actually earning the nickname after decades of habitual disappointment.
But what has been the root of their success? Well, unless you’re oblivious to all social media, it’s pretty clear that the bulk of the fan base gives credit to Dak Prescott for the Cowboys’ miraculous resurrection – which is not unwarranted. Dak has emerged as the clear future of the Dallas Cowboys, touting a passer rating of 103.9 with 1,486 yards and 7 touchdowns. What’s more impressive is that he takes care of the football, with only 1 interception (albeit 4 fumbles) through 6 games. He’s clearly a guy with a knack for managing football games and piling up the W’s, which is why football pundits and arm-chair quarterbacks across the nation are screaming at the top of their lungs: “Do NOT sideline the Dak-Attack for old-man-Romo!”
FOOTBALL PUNDIT-MANIA
It didn’t take long for a majority of the football “experts” to abandon Tony at the train station and load up on the Dak-Express. Troy Aikman, Steven A. Smith, Phil Simms, Skip Bayless and even Brett Favre are all in favor of Romo donning a headset for the remainder of the year (just to name a few examples). But the sports-media giants are not the only publications chiming in on the debate… With the controversy garnishing nationwide attention, even publications like The Wall Street Journal have tried to capitalize on the hysteria by throwing their opinion into the mix.
WARNING: At this point in the article, I need to ask everyone to take a minute to relax and search for that happy, zen-like place in your mind. Why do we need to relax, you ask? Great question – thanks for asking! It’s because I’m about to step away from the Dak-mania crowd and go full Romo-sexual, which apparently is a very unpopular thing to do. According to recent polls, 78.35% of you have either 1) Renamed your dog (or son) after Dak Prescott, 2) Stopped listening to Carrie Underwood because she once dated Romo, or 3) Re-purposed your Romo jersey as floor mop – But please folks, try to remain calm. We’ve got some important facts to discuss…
Well guess what? The majority of the pundits are simply dead-wrong. Yes, that’s right – I’m talking like forecast from The Weather Channel kind-of-wrong. I mean, Skip Bayless once claimed Tim Tebow was going to take the Jets to a Super Bowl! Are you kidding me?
The problem is most sports commentators, much like stock market analysts, don’t really aim to be “right”. They only try to make the safest bet and avoid being “wrong”. For example, in early 2007, Blackberry, Ltd. was plowing through the competition in the telecommunications industry. The success of the Blackberry cell phone had led the company stock price from $2.00 in 2002 to $230 in 2007. Market analysts at the time declared the company was unstoppable and encouraged investors to continue “riding the wave”. Well, I don’t know about you, but I haven’t seen a Blackberry in quite some time. Of course, Apple, Inc. released the iPhone in 2007 and quickly brushed Blackberry aside as they gained the bulk share of the cell phone industry. The analysts had been short-sighted and encouraged investors into what appeared to be the safe-bet due to the recent success of the stock. Hopefully you see where I am going with this. To be clear, I’m not saying that Dak is about to fall off into oblivion as Blackberry did – We’ve certainly found the future face of the franchise with Dak. I’m just pointing out that pundits and analysts are notoriously sheepish, and that the ability of the competition should be considered whether you’re making investment decisions or deciding which quarterback to start.
EDITOR’S NOTE: If you’ve got some real juevos, shares of Blackberry, Ltd. can currently be swiped up at the low, low price of around $7.00 a share…
NO R.E.S.P.E.C.T
Few people realize or give any credit to Tony’s actual accomplishments. In our “what have you done for me lately” society, fans and critics alike seem to dismiss his top-tier ability because he hasn’t been able to lead the Cowboys to new championships. But the stats can’t be ignored or pushed aside. When it comes to passer rating, Tony Romo comes in at 3rd on the list (All-Time). Yup, that’s 3rd in the entire history of the NFL, not just among active QB’s. Just to list a few names who fall below Tony: Peyton Manning, Kurt Warner, Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Brett Favre, Ben Rothlisberger, etc, etc…
I can already hear the Romo-Haters now: “Oh wow [sarcasm], he’s 3rd all-time in passer rating, but Romo can’t seem to close out games, that’s why he’s a loser!” Well, the haters are incorrect once again because our boy Tony happens to hold the 2nd highest 4th Quarter Passer Rating OF ALL TIME. Again, that’s an all-time stat (see above list for QB’s who fall below him).
To be honest, Romo has significant standing in practically every major category of the all-time stats, but he never gets credit for his entire body of work – only the memorable losses seem to come to the minds of the pundits when they form their opinions.
2014 RING A BELL?
Probably one of the most over-looked reasons for starting Romo when he is fully healthy is due to the success the Cowboys had in 2014. With DeMarco Murray in 2014, the Cowboys were able to bruise their way into leading the league in time of possession (54.69%), which kept the mediocre defense off the field as much as possible. In 2016, the Cowboys have looked very similar with Ezekiel Elliott in the backfield, coming in at 2nd in the league in TOP (55%). This not only limits the vulnerability of our defense, but it significantly opens up the down-field passing game for the quarterback. Dak Prescott has been the biggest benefactor of this, and I firmly believe it’s one of the main reasons that he’s had success this year.
But Tony Romo has more capability to push the ball down-field in the passing game than Dak Prescott does. If there has been any “flaw” in Dak’s performances this year, it’s that he has preferred to check down to the third and fourth pass options and hasn’t really challenged the defensive backs that he’s faced. Dak may have gotten away with this during the first 6 games, but we’ve played some very mediocre teams with a 17-24 combined record – he won’t get away with that kind of strategy down the stretch or in the playoffs. With Romo at QB, he’d be able to stretch the defense down field which would create gaping holes more frequently for the run game. He did it in 2014 for DeMarco and he’ll do it again for Zeke, if afforded the opportunity.
PLAYOFFS! PLAYOFFS?
Admittedly, Romo’s early playoff resume doesn’t exactly impress. As a matter of fact, one of the most common arguments I hear from Romo-haters is that “Tony is a choke-artist in the playoffs.” The “choke-artist” label for Romo first surfaced after he botched the snap on a game-winning field goal during the 2006 playoffs against the Seahawks. I can understand why this debacle would be permanently ingrained into the minds of the fan-base, and the Cowboys’ successive playoff appearances in ’07 and ’09 did little to restore his image either, but he certainly can’t shoulder all of the blame. The 2014 playoffs, however, are a much different story.
Every time I hear someone accuse Romo for the Cowboys’ quick exit from the 2014 playoffs, I have to question their knowledge of the game. After leading the ‘Boys to yet another 4th quarter comeback win against the Lions in the NFC Wildcard game, Romo was brilliant again against the Packers. He may have only thrown 19 passes, but he connected on 15 of them for 191 yards, 2 touchdowns and a Passer Rating of 143.6 (which is the 25th best PR in playoff history). Many will remember the game as the “Dez Bryant Catch/No-Catch” game, but the truth is, if DeMarco Murray had never fumbled in the 3rd quarter (leading to a Packers’ FG), or if the Dan Bailey field goal at the end of the 2nd quarter wasn’t blocked, the “Dez Bryant Catch/No-Catch” would have never even happened. Instead of going for it on that 4th and 2, the Cowboys would have just kicked a field goal for the win.
I understand that toying with the starting quarterback of a 5-1 (potentially 6-1) team is a scary proposition for any NFL fan base, but with how the league is shaping up this year, the Cowboys have a very real opportunity to make a deep run in the playoffs and contend for their sixth Super Bowl ring. Dak has been outstanding, and he’s certainly solidified his role as the future of the franchise, but let’s not lose sight of the forest through the trees. This IS and ALWAYS HAS BEEN Tony Romo’s team.
-
The One Thing That Will Make America’s Team Great Again
There have been many theories on why “America’s Team” has been average for the past two decades. Some have blamed Jerry Jones for the drought. Others point to the general manager (also Jerry Jones) for uncalculated free agent signings, poor drafting, and trying to create a team of big name ‘stars’ instead of building an actual TEAM. There are even some naysayers that believe the problem begins and ends at the quarterback position, including the much beloved Tony Romo. All of these reasons may have played a part, but the real reason resonates throughout every season since the glory days with The Triplets. The Dallas Cowboys head coaching since 1997 has been questionable, at best. Since Barry Switzer retired after the 1997 season, the Cowboys are 148-149 in the regular season and playoffs. While some may have been worse than others (Chan Gailey and Dave Campo), not one of the head coaches were impressive.
Let’s start with Bill Parcells, since the two preceding him were nothing more than placeholders. Parcells came into a situation when the cupboard was barer than any Cowboys roster since the 80’s. He had aging stars on the edge of retirement (Woodson and Allen) mixed with players that he got to perform well above their talent level (Coakley and Williams). This was Bill Parcells last head coaching job, and he treated it as such, by trying to build a team that another coach could come in and take back to the promised land. That included signing undrafted rookie Tony Romo to become the Cowboy’s first franchise quarterback since Troy Aikman. The problem was that Jerry Jones let that coordinator (Sean Payton) get away. Payton went on to become the head coach of the New Orleans Saints the year before Bill Parcells turned his job over to Wade Phillips. Wade was, and is, a great defensive coordinator, but as we’ve seen many times before, that does not always translate into being a great head coach. Wade’s job was made even harder since he most likely knew that his offensive coordinator, Jason Garrett, was basically a head coach in waiting. Wade took the Cowboys to the playoffs a couple of times in his stint as head coach, but was not able to make it past the divisional round either time.That brings us to the current head coach, Jason Garrett. He took over halfway through the 2010 season and is two games over .500 in that time. Not exactly a record that deserves the job security he seems to have with Jerry Jones. Jerry always seems to find an excuse for why Garrett failed, instead of demanding results in the face of adversity. While Garrett has a great football mind when it comes to X’s and O’s, that is where his coaching prowess ends. He possesses the skills needed to be a successful coordinator in the NFL, but falls short of those skills required to become a Super Bowl winning head coach.
Let’s look at the greatest example of an NFL head coach right now, Bill Belichik, and see how Garrett compares in three different areas. First, Belichik’s delegation is second to none, and the best way to exemplify this is by his coaching tree. He has produced seven NFL head coaches and seven NCAA Division I head coaches. One of those coaches was Nick Saban, who just so happened to be the head coach of the Miami Dolphins when Jason Garrett was the quarterbacks coach. That’s right, Belichik’s coaching tree is now so extensive, other trees are now growing off of it, and Garrett is a branch on one of those trees. While Garrett definitely has not had the tenure to grow the coaching tree Belichik has, by this time in his career Belichik had already promoted out Pat Hill to Fresno State and Nick Saban to Michigan State.Second, Belichik’s in-game strategy makes Garrett look as if he learned how to game plan by playing Techmo Bowl. We could delve into the most specific and minute stats to see how Belichik makes more right decisions than Garrett, but the easiest is to look at how they react when their hands are tied by playing without their respective star quarterbacks. Since Brady became the starter, Belichik is 15-5 with his backup quarterback, a winning percentage only 1 percent lower than with Brady. Since Garrett took over as head coach of the Cowboys he is 7-14 without Romo as the starter, a whopping 26 percent lower winning percentage than with Romo. Basically, that means if Brady is out, the Patriots still have almost an equal shot at winning with Belichik, but if Romo is out the Cowboys are about half as likely to come away with a win with Garrett.
Finally, Belichik’s superiority over Garrett can be seen by the talent he can attract from around the league. From big free agents superstars like Darrelle Revis to proven talent in Chris Long to the Golden Boy himself, the Patriots can continually get cream of the crop talent for considerably less than they are worth on the open market. Not only do the Cowboys have to pay top dollar for free agents to come play for America’s Team, they could not even convince their All-Pro running back, Demarco Murray, to take even the slightest pay cut to stick around.
Being quarterback for the Dallas Cowboys is one of the hardest positions in sports. It’s up there with playing Shortstop for the Yankees or Center for the Lakers, but the head coach in Dallas is no stress-free job either. Tom Landry and Jimmy Johnson flourished in the role, while Barry Switzer and Bill Parcells were good within their own right. These coaches were used to the bright lights that come with being the head coach of America’s Team. Jason Garrett’s resume prior to the Cowboys is less than impressive, to say the least. To say he had never been in the spotlight before is an understatement. In fact, he was so far from the spotlight he couldn’t even cast a shadow. From quarterbacking Ivy League schools – to bouncing around in lesser professional leagues – to becoming a career NFL backup – to coaching in the NFL, Jason Garrett had never been a focal point of any meaningful organization. So the next time you see a ‘deer in the headlights’ look while watching a Cowboys news conference, or the next time you cringe at Garrett’s horrible game-management ability, try to keep in mind that he’s still adjusting his vision to the bright lights at The Star. Unfortunately for Cowboy fans, he may also be the roadblock to a sixth championship ring.
-
Super Bowl LI Proves the Need for a New Kind of NFL Coach
Many things can be said about the game-play in Super Bowl LI, from the Falcons offense looking to be unstoppable through the first 38 minutes to Tom Brady channeling his inner GOAT to pull off what most people could only imagine as achievable theoretically. However, the biggest difference between the New England and the Atlanta was that the Patriots knew who their opponent was and the Falcons did not. The real opponent for both teams was the clock. The Falcons needed it to run as fast as possible, while the Patriots realized that each second was precious, with a 25 point deficit to overcome.
It seems strange that with all of the analytics used in sports nowadays, the degree to which each aspect of the game is individualized (I mean, there are actually separate coaches for inside linebackers and outside linebackers), and the number of times that clock management can affect the outcome of a game, that there is not a position solely dedicated to how to manage that clock.
Hindsight is always 20/20, but looking at the 2017 NFL playoffs, there were three close games, two of which were decided largely by late-game clock management. The first game was the Packers vs. Cowboys in the divisional round, and the second was the Super Bowl.
The clock mismanagement in divisional round was by the Cowboys, who were attempting to comeback from a 15 point 4th quarter deficit. For a two score comeback to occur, both the offense and the defense must play well, but clock management becomes crucial. The biggest misstep for the Cowboys came on their final drive. They received the ball with 93 seconds left in the game. In the final drive, two critical clock management decisions to look at are the spike on 1st and 10 from the Packers 40 yard line with 1:07 on the clock, and 2 plays later with a passing play on 3rd down with 44 seconds left. Perhaps a clock management coach looks at these situations and plays them somewhat differently. From using their final timeout or running a play on first down, so as not to ‘waste’ a down with a spike. That same coach may realize that a successful short pass and a successful run will likely have similar outcomes on 3rd down, but an incomplete pass stops the clock and a running play short of the line to gain keeps the clock running. That running clock may be just enough to make sure Aaron Rodgers does not have time to orchestrate a game-winning drive, and instead push the game to overtime.
In the Super Bowl, the clock mismanagement will be credited to the Atlanta Falcons, who needed only to hold on to a 25 point lead in the middle of the 3rd quarter. Reread that sentence, there is no typo. The Falcons had a four score lead with just over 17 minutes left in the game. There are once again two key plays that involve clock management, they may have swung the game and final score into the Falcons favor. The first was the catastrophic fumble with 8:31 left in the game, and the Falcons possessed a 16 point (two score) lead. Many will say of course you run when you know that a sack fumble is happening, but even not knowing that a pass is much riskier than a run in that situation, especially when your running back, Devonta Freeman, is averaging over 8 yards per carry at that point. The risk is way to high for a 3rd and 1 pass with a 16 point lead and 8:31 left on the clock, compared to the reward. A clock management coach realizes that and runs the ball. The second decision comes with just under 4 minutes left, again a pass play over a run, this time on second down on the New England 22. The play results in a 12 yard sack and the Patriots use a timeout. No big deal, still in field goal range to make it a two score game. 3rd down attempt #1 is a completed pass that doesn’t get a first down but gives them a better shot at a field goal, but there is a hold. Now they are out of field goal range and are forced to pass to get back into range. 3rd down attempt #2 is an incomplete pass and the Falcons are forced to punt without being able to run the clock. A clock management coach realizes that a field goal in this situation is practically just as good as a touchdown, since it pretty much guarantees that the Patriots will have to complete a successful onside kick if they score. Instead, the Patriots get the ball back with just under 4 minutes left, and Tom Brady becomes the GOAT of all GOATs.
Isn’t clock management the job of the head coach? Can’t the quarterback figure these things out? Two great questions, but in the heat of battle, having a numbers guy whose sole job is to analyze the game based on the amount of time left, could prove to be invaluable. Just ask Arthur Blank if he would’ve coughed up an extra $150k to have a clock specialist on the coaching staff.
-
BREAKING NEWS: Mavs trade up for Luka Doncic
After Luka Doncic, the 19 year old Slovenian soon-to-be star, made it past the Sacramento Kings with the 2nd pick in the 2018 NBA Draft, the Dallas Mavericks traded picks with the Atlanta Hawks. This allowed the Mavs to pickup who many believe is the 2nd best talent in this year’s draft. The Mavs will also have to give up next year’s first round pick (protected) to the Hawks, in addition to Trae Young who was selected with Dallas’ original 5th pick.
Luka Doncic is a 6’7″ wing player who was the youngest Euroleague MVP & Euroleague Final Four MVP ever at 19 years old.
This is a breaking story. More information will follow.
Right on! This article is truly accurate. For those Romo haters, they will always remembered the things that Romo did bad, or somehow find something to blamed Romo for. So, I am grateful to read such beautiful article written from a very intelligent and knowledgeable person!
One question about all these nice stats. How many rings does he have ? He has never been a championship caliber qb. And clearly now more than ever he never will. So keep adding oto the stats
That’s right Phia, Romo is one of the all time greats. And if the Cowboys are going to the Super Bowl Romo will have to get healthy and take them. Dak is limited in what he has been allowed to do. That is by coaching design. Play to his strength and keep it controlled. Otherwise don’t lose games. When Romo gets back they will start really turning the offense loose and people will really like the looks of this team. I take nothing from Dak he is the future but he hasn’t faced any real tests. But Romo is the guy who can do it now not Dak…
Thank you for the facts to many people are so quick to blame the QBfor everything but when you had one of the worst defenses during all of this the owner pulls a bonehead move and trades the leagues leading rusher we have a piss poor offensive line that wasn’t protecting Room. And it is all Romo’s fault. Let get really all you haters. This is a team sport and everyone shoulders the blame startering with the owner making bad decisions that lead to failure. So word of advise if you open your mouth base it on facts. Fact we have a great offensive line that is protecting Dak. How often can you say that Room had this? Not that often. Fact strong running back that is health. How often has he had this with a good offensive performing line? Not that often. And when have did we last have a defense that did their job acceptably ? Not in the recent past. Now when did we .haveall of this at the same time?
As a die hard cowboys fan I have always known that romo was an elite top tier quarter back thanks for the solidification.. It’s an honor for any player to don the star but can we please be realistic about the glass man?? Romo is injury prone and he’s also in his mid 30s.. Where does that place us as a franchise if we derail the dak express for an accident waiting to happen?? In a boat gone fishing.. The future is now and as they say if it ain’t broke don’t let the broke man play lol or something to that affect..
Absolutely this is his team have said over and over and when he finally does step in were going to fire on all cylinders! There isn’t going to be 1 team in the playoffs that isn’t going to feed what’s coming there way
Phia, glad you liked the article. Thanks for the complement.
Thanks for this article. I’m so tired of all the Romo hate. He’s a great quarterback that is going to come back and take us to the superbowl. Go Cowboys!
Thank you Carlton, and we hope you are right!
I too am thankful to finally read an article with ALL the Romo facts. He is an amazing guy on and off the field yet people hate him. I totally agree with everything you have said. Spot on!! Romo deserves the chance with thia team to get a ring.
Thanks for reading Griffin. Dak’s a great quarterback and I love the guy. But until he develops the downfield capability, I think we need Romo. Last night was a great victory, but there were way too many times where he couldn’t hit wide open receivers (mainly Dez) deep downfield. If he’d of made a few of those throws, we wouldn’t have even gone into OT. Thanks again –
Bravo, nicely done. I’ve used similar arguments. Not to mention, Romo has sacrificed his body at the expense of some very bad o-lines. If it wasn’t or him, those mediocre years of 8-8 would have looked like 2015, 4-12.
Thanks Brian, and I agree. But more and more each day I feel like it’s going to take a Loss before we see Romo again. Maybe Dak can develop the deep ball over the next few weeks, but I don’t anticipate that after seeing last nights game. Our defense won’t always bail us out…
Wow its a great article, thank you!! Romo is and will always be a great QB regardless of his haters! Not to mention, a great person, mentor, and teammate!! Teams respect Romo more than they do Dak right now, and that’s why Romo needs a chance when he’s completely healthy! You are absolutely right about those long passes where the receivers were wide open, and shouldn’t have been that close of a game!! Thank you again for all those stats!!
He was 12-4 , left the team at 3-0 and you don’t think he can do it? Dak is doing good ,but did you see how many ball he threw to the ground , when they could easily been completed, we can’t give up those passes especially with Dez, you watch Tony throw the ball to Dez, Dak can’t get it out there as good as Tony.. not to mention we can’t say the rushing game is winning games for us also, not just dak,, But until then keep doing your thing Dak.. DC4L
finally some god damn sense with someone in the media…good read
I’m a fan of Romo as well! You stated your case very well with his stats. Romo has always been a good quarterback in my eyes! I just would love for him to be 100% healthy and ready when he returns to the game. In the meantime, allow Dak to do what he’s been doing all season! Great read, thanks!
I like the article as well I think that Romo is the better choice right now downfield accuracy and keeping the defenses honest Ezekiel Elliott is going to be able to get the same type of running lines that DeMarco Murray had if you’re stretching the field and you’re giving the defense an option of picking their poison we have a potent offense we have a potent offense with Dak. But I think that it’s still Romo’s team even if they don’t make a Deep Run they should Romo Romo because the team is geared toward his skill-set.
Great read!!!! I believe in the best interest for the team. I’m a huge DALLAS fan and enjoy watching the Boys win games. The truth is we have two amazing QBS on our squad. And when Tony is 100% I don’t see a problem of rotating Romo and Dak depending on what the play calls for. Yes defenses might be able to read what the play is going to be depending on who the quarterback is but with the accuracy that we have from Tony it really won’t matter when Tony’s in the game and he links up with one of his receivers mainly Bryant or even down to Witten it doesn’t matter who is guarding or what kind of defense they’re running if Tony is there to hook up with him he’s going to make the pass is going to complete it and vice versa with Dak. I belive in giving the team the best chance at winning this year and every year and want so bad to see us go the the playoffs and win a superb owl even if that means using both QBS and what ever their strengths are put it in whoever you need to depending on what the play calls for and using the strengths of both quarterbacks. Tony is a great qb and I wpuld like to see his stay healthy and honestly like to see him back in a game just to see him step up and play like his job is on the line which looks like it may be. that being said I believe that he will step up and play his hardest and play his smartest and put those numbers on the scoreboard and allow us to win games if you can get Romo in there and put the points on the board and take him out late in the game and put it back in you know that Dak will ultimately do the same he will put more points on the board or he’ll at least move the chains and get our running game going. I’m a firm believer in using both quarterbacks rotating in and out using them for their strengths and their weaknesses to win games and ultimately bring the Lombardi trophy home at the end of the year.
Great article! I’m also tired of the Romo haters and fair weather fans. Dak is great but let’s not forget what Romo has done for our tteam.
You seem to leave out how injury prone Romo has become, don’t get me wrong I agree that statistically Romo is a great quarter back, but over for a while now he has become incredibly injury prone, out pretty much all of last year and now this year as well as years before that. Romo has become FRAGILE!! While now we have Dak, younger, healthier, quick, has a good mentality and mind for the game, and on his way to become statistically far better than Romo will be, he has his whole career ahead of him. Yes he has made some mistakes but he’s just starting.
Charles Sneed
Romo is a great QB but this article is telling half the story….yes Romo might be able to throw down field better but there’s things Dak can do to take pressure off the running game too…QB read option from time to time…he also takes care of the ball way better then Romo….I haven’t seen Romo throw a ball away in years I’m sure he has but probably only inside the 20 and how long will we be able to depend on Romo since he’s so injury prone….just too many question marks for me
Thanks for the article. I personally see Romo as the Blackberry and Dak as the iPhone in your analogy. As you described I have forgotten all Romo has done in favor of what he hasn’t. I now see Romo as injury prone and brittle. As for being his Team, he played 4 regular season games last year and no games this year. Much of this young team know Dak better than Tony at this point. Elliott hasn’t even taken a handoff from him in regular season. Regardless of who plays down the stretch, We are lucky to have strong options at the QB slot.
I’m a die hard cowboys fan, I guess people for get how it was before Romo when we didn’t have a quarter back after troy. We went years trying to find someone then he took over and we have had a good offense. Eveyone forgets there are 3 phased of the game. Romo only plays one but it takes all 3 to will the game. He’s one of the greats and people need to understand that it’s a team sport. It’s his team. Here is another thing did everyone forget about what happened to the redskins? His name was RG3 oh wow he is so great he’s the best. How that work out for him and them not very good the next year after his rookie season now did it. Dak is good but not like Romo more like RG3 plays the same way dump off passes and running out of the pocket. Just a thought while everyone his ready to trade Romo away for Dak a rookie that hasn’t really played a good team yet.
Just saying!!!
Sounds like some fans and credicts r having a problem letting something go? The future has no time to wait for something of the past. Romo was very good ! But it would be foolish to change something special that came out of the dark. Embrace the new franchise QB and prepare for a road to victory.